Thera (Santorini) and the Problems of Chronology
So far we have omitted the big problem of Minoan chronology, the problem of the dating of Thera. Thera, or Santorini, is an island 60 miles north of Crete – to the modern tourist it is the southern most of the Cyclades islands and the end of the tourist boats from Athens.
Thera is a volcano and in 1628 BC it exploded, sending tens of thousands of tons of dust into the atmosphere. Thera consists of the top part of a caldera of a huge volcano, the central part of which is submerged, and today the steamers sail into this central part and hover inside the volcano, while the tourist buses then crawl up the zigzag road to the present day rim on which the idyllic modern tourist resorts are situated. In the Minoan period, there was a settlement on Thera known as Akrotiri which was buried beneath the eruption and thus preserved like Pompeii and has recently been excavated. The culture of the settlement was very like that of the Minoans, and it has often been considered to be a Minoan ‘colony’ — indeed the wall paintings from Akrotiri provide by far and away the best examples of Minoan art.
But what was the date of the eruption of Thera? This is one of the biggest problems of the chronology of the Aegean world because the scientific dating of the eruption and the archaeological dating do not agree; indeed they differ by 100 years or more. The problem is still unsolved and consequently two sets of dating are given for the eruption: the ‘Long Chronology’ based on the scientific dating, and the ‘Short Chronology’ based on the historical dating. This is a big problem, and in 1989 the links with Egypt and the rest of the Near Eastern world were examined in detail by Peter Warren and Vronwy Hankey.
The eruption of Thera was enormous, and would have had an effect not only on Thera itself, but far wider. There would have been a major effect on Crete, just 70 miles south where at the very least there would have been a huge tsunami, a wave of water that certainly caused major destruction all along the north coast of Crete, particularly at Amnisos, the port of Knossos. A huge amount of volcanic ash would also have been ejected high in the sky and this would have caused bad weather worldwide. The nearest event we know, the explosion of Krakatoa in Indonesia in 1883 produced vivid sunsets around the world for several years, and Thera was a bigger explosion than Krakatoa, and would have had a worldwide effect reaching even as far as Ireland and Greenland.
In 1939 Spiridon Marinatos, the ‘Mortimer Wheeler ‘ of Greek archaeology, and the excavator of Akrotiri wrote an influential article arguing that it was Thera that brought the palace civilisation to a close. This was soon seen to be wrong: the pottery found in the ruins of Akrotiri comes in the middle of the pottery sequence in the Palaces. In terms of pottery chronology, in LMIb, a ‘marine’ style comes into fashion, when pots are decorated with marine creatures, but this marine style is not found in Akrotiri, so the eruption must have occurred sometime towards the end of LMIa, while the Palaces did not collapse till the end of LMIb. And in the conventional dating, the end of LM1a comes out at somewhere around 1500 BC. There is thus a gap of somewhere around 100 years between the traditional dating of 1500 BC and the scientific dating of 1628 BC.
Three scientific methods have been used to date the explosion: the most popular is tree-ring dating (dendrochronology) which gives an exact date of 1628 BC. Tree-ring dating is based on the annual growth of tree rings which varies year by year and patterns can be built up which can give an exact date. Occasionally there are bad years when the trees did not grow and tree ring specialists argue that these are the results of volcanic explosions. A number of tree-ring sequences have been built up, notably that by Mike Baillie at Belfast based on the Irish bog oaks and he noted a major blip in the tree ring sequence in 1628 BC which he argued was due to the clouds of dust from the Thera eruption which caused bad weather even as far away as Ireland. A similar blip was noted in the Californian bristle cone pine sequence, though this was dated a year later in 1627 BC.
A similar scientific technique is the use of the ice cores from Greenland which reveal a deposit of volcanic ash dated to 1642. However the latest research suggests that this is the wrong kind of volcanic ash and refers to a different volcano.
Then there is radiocarbon dating. This is the technique where the discrepancy was first noted, and there have been a number of datings, the most recent on an olive branch buried beneath the lava flow which has been dated to between 1627 and 1600 BC. None of these techniques is of course perfect but they do provide a sort of consensus that the eruption occurred sometime around 1600 to 1650 BC.
The archaeological dating however all tends to come out about a century later. The more important dating evidence comes from Egypt, but unfortunately Thera comes in one of the few periods when Egyptian chronology is uncertain. This is known as the ‘Second Intermediate period’ when law and order collapsed and Egypt split into two halves with different rulers in the north and in the south. The north was even ruled by foreign kings – the Hyksos, who formed the 18th dynasty, normally dated 1674-1535 BC. They had a new capital right up in the delta, known as Avaris which has been identified near the modern village of Tell el-Dabaa.
Here Minoan style wall paintings have been discovered by the Austrian archaeologist Manfred Bietak in a palace down by the river and this it was hoped would provide an exact synchronism. However most of the frescos were found not in position, but dumped in the garden outside the palace. At first it was thought that the dumps were made outside a citadel built at the very end of the Hyksos period. However more recent excavations have suggested that they are outside a palace built by the pharaoh Ahmose (dates uncertain, but around 1540-1525) , who was the pharaoh who reunited the two halves of Egypt after the defeat of the Hyksos, and is thus the first pharaoh of the New Kingdom. Indeed even more confusingly, there is some evidence that the palace could have been built by the long-lived Tuthmose III who is more securely dated from 1479 – 1425 BC.
So the Egyptian evidence itself is highly controversial, but nevertheless the historical dating seems to centre on a date around 1500 BC which is the date normally given for the LM1A to LM1B interface in Minoan Crete. So whichever way you look at it, the scientific evidence seems to centre around 1600 and the Egyptian-based evidence seems to centre around 1500 BC. The situation is deadlocked.
Inevitably when one comes to write a cohesive account of the Minoans — as I am trying to do here — the easiest option is to go by the traditional account. It makes sense and is coherent: if one is to change the date of Thera, one will have to change the whole of Egyptian dating too. Admittedly the date for the eruption of Thera does fall towards the end of one of the most chaotic periods of Egyptian history, and it is possible that the dates here can be shifted a little. It is not for me to arbitrate and if I take the line of least resistance and use the traditional account, I can at least offer a coherent and consistent story. But the scientific evidence is beginning to look very impressive.
The Minoan Empire is one of the most interesting and most attractive of all the ancient Palace empires. But it finally fell to the Mycenaeans, and it is to the Mycenaeans that we must now briefly turn.
24th August 2016