Theodosius – the Great?
What does it feel like when a society teeters on the edge, when decline is about to become a fall? Let us examine the story of Theodosius ‘the Great’, the emperor who removed the Altar of Victory from the senate, regardless of the views of the traditionalists who said that to remove the Altar of Victory risked the fall of Rome. And let us examine the evil genius, the Svengali of declining Rome who held emperors in his sway and bent them to his will.
If we are to tell a story of the decline and fall from the conventional historical point of view, the crucial figure is Theodosius – the Great? I always feel we should put a question mark after ‘The Great’ because he was an enigmatic, rather unsatisfactory figure, interesting perhaps from a psychological point of view, but someone where one needs to sum up the pluses and minuses.
Let us start with the pluses. He was the last emperor of the combined Roman Empire, east and west: Justinian a century and a half later partially reconquered the West but by that time Gaul and northern Spain were both long gone. One should also give him credit for erecting the Egyptian obelisk that still stands in its original form in Constantinople. Originally it lay on the spine of the Hippodrome, but it is set on a pedestal that depicts Theodosius and his court in what passes for high art in the declining years of the Roman Empire.
The first minus is that following his death he left the Empire to his two sons aged eight and 12, and 15 years after his death Rome fell to Alaric the Goth. The second big question concerns Christianity, for it was Theodosius who finally outlawed the pagans so that in less than a century, Christianity turned from being a spasmodically persecuted religion to a religion that was actively persecuting all other religions, becoming the first totalitarian creed in the world.
The waters are muddied because the most extreme Theodosian decrees came only at the end of his reign, and were spasmodic in their application. But the trouble is that the Christians do not quite know whether to be proud of the fact that all other religions were finally persecuted or whether to be rather ashamed of the intolerance that Christianity now finally revealed. And strangely enough the atheists too are confused by the fact that the decrees were scattered over several years, and have rarely made out Theodosius to be the monster whose intolerance pushed Rome to the edge. (It does not help that there is no satisfactory history of this era: the history of Ammianus Marcellinus ends with the death of Valens and thus the story of this period has to be constructed from very unsatisfactory sources).
But let us begin at the beginning. How did Theodosius become emperor? The answer as is usual in the late Roman world was by inheritance. His father, normally known as Count Theodosius, was a successful general who rose not from the Balkans but from Spain. He is best known for his work in Britain. In 367 Britain was faced by a “Barbarian Conspiracy”: the Picts and the Scots attacked south from Hadrian’s Wall, and the Franks and Saxons attacked from across the sea. Count Theodosius landed at Richborough, marched on London and recaptured the country, reorganising Hadrian’s Wall as a single unit for the last time. But he then fell foul of the court and was executed (a fatal reward for success), so his son, also Theodosius, who had already begun to show military competence, retreated to the family estates in Spain where he lay low and became a country gentleman living in his villa.
But then the Empire was struck by a disaster – a huge defeat at the Battle of Adrianople. Following Julian, two brothers became Emperor- Valentinian and Valens of whom Valentinian was semi-competent and boorish, and Valens was semi-incompetent and boorish. Valens was in charge of the east, which included the Balkans and had problems with the Goths, who were being pushed out of their hereditary Germanic lands by the Huns, coming in from further east, so he allowed them to cross the Danube and settle in the former Roman province. However he then mistreated them – big mistake – and as a result they turned against the Roman Empire, allied themselves with their friends across the Danube, and at the battle of Adrianople in 378 defeated the Roman Empire in what was said to be the worst Roman defeat since the battle of Cannae against Hannibal in 216 BC. The Emperor Valens was killed, and the Empire was on the brink of collapse.
The other Emperor, Valentinian, had died two years earlier, so his 19-year old son Gratian was in charge, so he recalled the only semi-competent Roman general he could think of, that was Theodosius, and invited him to become the Emperor of the West. Theodosius accepted the invitation, and to some extent succeeded in steadying the situation, but in a most disastrous way by giving in to the Goths. Hitherto there had been a long tradition of recruiting Barbarians into the Roman army, but the army and its structure and officers remained Roman. Theodosius went one disastrous stage further and turned the invading forces into ‘allies’, so that instead of having a Roman army albeit of Barbarian troops, much of the army now consisted of barbarian ‘allies’ under their own commanders, whose loyalty was always in doubt.
Trouble also came from northern Europe, starting indeed in Britain. Here the local commander, Magnus Maximus was proclaimed Emperor by his troops. Gaul and indeed Spain soon recognised him as Emperor. He was in fact a Spaniard by origin and probably a friend or indeed at least a colleague of Theodosius, a fellow Spaniard. For a time it seemed that Theodosius might recognise him in place of the miserable official emperor Valentinian II, the younger brother of Gratian. However the relationship between the two Spaniards broke down, Magnus moved into Italy, and Theodosius eventually defeated him. But the name of Magnus lived on in Welsh epic as Macsen Wledig, and even made an appearance in the Arthurian legends recorded by Geoffrey of Monmouth. But he was tolerant of pagans and had he defeated Theodosius, the story of the ending of Rome might have been very different.
At this point we must turn eventually to Christianity, and consider the dominating figure, the Svengali of the late Roman Empire: Saint Ambrose, Bishop of Milan. A non-Christian account of the history of the world would probably consider Ambrose to be one of the great bad men, the Lenin of Western civilisation, who turned Christianity from being the merely the dominant religion into being the only religion, and thus the first totalitarian creed in the world. Ambrose was the most dangerous type of manipulators, in that he was basically a superb administrator- a civil servant who manipulated his masters into going to extremes. He began as an administrator and by the age of 32 he was the administrator of the province of Milan, which at this time was the fulcrum of the Roman West. But in 374 the Bishop died and a dispute arose over the new bishop – should it be an Arian or a Nicene (i.e. a believer in the Nicene Creed)? Ambrose was brought in to arbitrate, but then someone said, why not make Ambrose bishop? Ambrose protested that he was not even baptised but he was swept along by popular enthusiasm and within the week – so the story goes – he was baptised, ordained as a priest and elected as Bishop. Once he became bishop, he turned out to be the most persecuting of all bishops.
The crucial event is one that is revealing both of the weakness of Theodosius and of the superb psychological manipulation practised by Ambrose. In Thessalonica, the leading city of what is today Northern Greece, there was a massacre. Goths had been quartered on the city, and their commander arrested a popular charioteer for a homosexual offence – he tried to rape a male cup-bearer. The populace was inflamed and the commander was killed. Theodosius was enraged and set the Gothic soldiers onto the populace when they were penned up in the circus, and 7,000 innocent citizens were massacred. This was a stupid thing to do and reveals Theodosius’s real character – he was a manic depressive, given to fits of rage followed by excessive depression. Ambrose set out to exploit this and said he would not come to court until the Emperor had done penance. Again it shows something of Theodosius’s weaknesses that he accepted this – a stronger man would simply have ignored the bishop. But he performed his penance and was eventually allowed back. However this meant that he was very much under the control of Ambrose, and Ambrose set to work to persuade him to carry out the decrees that made Christianity supreme, and to destroy the old Roman religion.
Attacking the pagans
The attack on paganism came in two waves. Pagans literally are those living in the countryside, but paganism was still strong among the upper traditional upper-class in Rome: it was essentially a belief in the traditional values that had made Rome great, and the senate at Rome, and indeed the mass of the countryside population still remained attached to the old ways. And in any case much of the Christian fervour was devoted to fighting other Christians – basically the Nicenes versus the Arians (and here it is as well to remember that Rome and Alexandria were both basically Nicene, while Constantinople remained obstinately Arian, as did the army, and those Germans who had been converted).
Ambrose’s first big success came in 380 when he persuaded the two emperors – Theodosius in the West and Gratian in the East – to promote the Edict of Thessalonica – basically aimed against the Arians of Constantinople. But it was aimed at the Pagans too: and when the mob attacked Pagan temples, they were not punished.
The next major step was over the Altar to Victory in the Senate house. This was originally brought to Rome as loot in the Pyric Wars in 272 BC, and in 29 BC it was placed in the senate house by Augustus, and Senators had offered incense on it. However in 357 AD it was removed by Constantine II, was then restored by Julian the Apostate and removed again by Gratian in 382. In 384 the great orator Symmachus, the leader of the traditionalists made a great plea that it should be restored. It was a symbol of Rome’s greatness and if it was removed Rome would surely fall. Ambrose opposed him and said that Rome was safe and Theodosius refused even to hear the delegation. 26 years later, Rome fell.
The main attack on paganism was centred on sacrifice. This always seems rather strange to us, – indeed the idea that to carry out your religion you need to kill an animal seems rather abhorrent. Yet Julian the Apostate positively revelled in making blood sacrifices and getting his hands covered in blood. We should remember that one of the main appeals of Christianity is its repudiation of sacrifice; the rigmarole that Christ died for our sins always seems rather strange to us today, yet this has a really positive and beneficial implication in that it meant that we do not need to carry out sacrifices ourselves, and in many parts of the world this is still a big selling point for Christianity as against primitive religions.
Admittedly sacrifice did also involve feasting: once you have sacrificed an animal, you cook it and eat it, and to some extent giving up your sacrifice also implied giving up your feasting, and the Christians were rather like Jehovah’s Witnesses going around saying you should give up celebrating Christmas. But mainline Christianity soon adopted the feasts and turned Saturnalia into Christmas. Though of course the Christians themselves in their cult of martyrs and the celebration of the bones of saints were also rather gruesome, and the pagans could and did counter-attack on the Christian cult of bones; but it was the attack on blood sacrifice that was successful.
Eventually, Theodosius was pushed by Ambrose into making four successive decrees, which form the central part of the descent into totalitarianism which must form a major role in the story of the decline and fall of the Roman Empire. There were four Theodosian decrees. The first, in February 391, prohibited all sacrifice: no one should approach or go near the temples on pain of a fine of £15 of gold. This was followed on 9 June by a second decree forbidding Christians to apostatise back to paganism – something that has been taken over by the Moslems who behead those who convert from Islam to Christianity – you can be a Christian in Muslim lands, but once you become a Moslem, you can not go back. A third decree on the 16 June, repeated the February decree especially for Egypt where there was a great fear of abandoning the traditional beliefs because it was thought that the Nile floods depended on the gods and if they were abandoned, the Nile would no longer flood; the ancient gods were abandoned, and the Nile continued to flood.
Then on the 8th November 392 – a day of disgrace for all Christians – came the most severe decree of all: sacrifice and divination was forbidden on pain of death, all pagan symbols were prohibited even within the house, and the decurions, the local government officers were ordered to inform on anyone transgressing, and governors were ordered to investigate every case. Altars, house lamps, gods of hearth and kitchens, even the placing of wreaths on trees was specifically forbidden. Ambrose wrote to congratulate Theodosius that now he had wiped out all worship of graven images and trampled down the pagan ceremonies. Stalin would have approved.
Modern historians are slightly puzzled by the decrees, for Theodosius was generally a fairly cautious administrator. One scholar, C E King remarks that ‘it is a measure of Theodosius’ greatness, laziness, or duplicity that he was able to continue a policy which held together two mutually contradictory ideas, the broad Imperial toleration of Constantine and Valentinian I, and the root-and-branch persecution advocated by Ambrose’. It would seem that following Theodosius’ humiliation in Thessalonica, he was now totally under the control of Ambrose.
The policy was not carried out to the letter – many of the senior officials still remained pagan – indeed the praetorian prefects in both East and West were both pagans. Nevertheless they can be little doubt that in the long run it was extremely effective, for in the next generation Christianity became overwhelmingly the main religion with pagans becoming very much a small minority even if an important minority – thankfully a number of historians remained pagans and wrote reasonable history.
Destroying the temples
But in practical terms, the major attack on the Christians was the destruction of the temples, and here the point of focus is the destruction of the Serapaeum in Alexandria. Serapis was a ‘new’ god who satisfactorily combined the Egyptian and Greek religions, and the Serapaeum was built between 246 and 222 BC and was the largest Greek temple in Alexandria. The temple was huge and at one time it appeared to have been used as an annex to the Library of Alexandria. It became the focus of the Christian attacks: the Pagans used it as a fortress, but eventually the Christians won and the temple was destroyed. It had been the symbol of paganism, and following its destruction, many were converted to Christianity. Similarly, there were bands of hooligans known as the ‘marauding monks’ who went round deliberately destroying temples, something which was probably technically illegal but was nevertheless tolerated perhaps even approved by the Christian authorities.
Archaeologists have often sought evidence the destruction of temples in this period, but have been widely disappointed. It seems that in the fourth century there were continuing attempts to tidy up the towns of the Roman Empire. By this time towns had become cluttered with statues of worthies and temples had become chock-a-block full of offerings, and often attempts were made to tidy up a town by moving all the surplus statues into storage, and archaeologists have often been puzzled when they come across these storage areas. But undoubtedly many temples had decayed by the end of the fourth century and it is a little difficult to distinguish between deliberate demolition by the Christians and tidying up by hard pressed municipal authorities. Nevertheless a surprising number of early churches are built on the foundations of temples and one must assume that within the next century there was a mass movement towards converting temples into churches. Christianity had won.
In 393, the Olympic Games were celebrated for the last time, but they too were then abolished for a further 1500 years. Theodosius lived only another two years, but in 395 he died at the age of 48, leaving the Empire to his two young sons, Arcadius aged 12, who took the east, and Honorius aged 8, who took the west. Effective power passed to the guardian of Honorius, the Vandal Stilicho. He at least kept Rome safe; but soon after his death, in 410, Alaric the Goth sacked Rome.
On to The Fourth Century